{
  "creator": [
    "Strack, Micha",
    "Gennerich, Carsten"
  ],
  "date": [
    "2011-08-26"
  ],
  "description": [
    "In interpersonal value conflicts ethical principles are employed to  justify own actions. However, there is competition among ethical  principles. Therefore the preference for a specific ethical principle  may be merely a function both of personal values and of the value-laden  situations in which actions are made. A German sample of 132  partici-pants rated their agreement on ten justifications in seven  experimentally constructed situations. The situations varied in their  expression of values, organized by the value circle (Schwartz, 1992).  The justifications assess five ethical principles (deontology,  utilitarianism, partiality, hedonism, and intuitionism). Variance  components of the agreement ratings were separated using GLM and plotted  in the value circle. Preferences for ethical principles depended on  both the value content of situations and the responder values. The  Person x Situation interaction was not significant. The results  illustrate the difficulties in gaining agreement on arguments among  individuals with conflicting values."
  ],
  "format": [
    "application/pdf"
  ],
  "identifier": [
    "https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/142",
    "10.5964/ejop.v7i3.142"
  ],
  "language": [
    "eng"
  ],
  "publisher": [
    "PsychOpen GOLD / Leibniz Institut for Psychology (ZPID)"
  ],
  "relation": [
    "https://ejop.psychopen.eu/index.php/ejop/article/view/142/142.pdf"
  ],
  "rights": [
    "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0"
  ],
  "source": [
    "Europe’s Journal of Psychology; Vol. 7 No. 3 (2011); 419-442",
    "1841-0413"
  ],
  "subject": [
    "values",
    "moral reasoning",
    "person-situation interaction"
  ],
  "title": [
    "Personal and situational values predict ethical reasoning"
  ],
  "type": [
    "info:eu-repo/semantics/article",
    "info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"
  ]
}